Portfolio Assessment Structure

Each Problem Set contains multiple tiers of questions designed to scaffold learning and measure different cognitive skills:

• Tier 1: Multiple-Choice Questions (15-20 minutes) – Foundational comprehension and rule recognition. Auto-scored or instructor-scored for accuracy.
• Tier 2: Short-Answer & Medium-Answer Questions (20-40 minutes) – Rule synthesis, fact analysis, and focused application. Measures precision and conciseness.
• Tier 2.5 or Tier 3: Essay Questions (45-60 minutes) – Comprehensive analysis in CREAC format. Tests ability to identify issues, state rules, explain through precedent, apply strategically, and reach conclusions.

Revision & Learning Cycle

Each Problem Set includes a revision opportunity designed to reinforce learning and develop self-assessment skills:

• Students submit initial drafts and receive instructor feedback
• Class debrief addresses common errors and correct applications
• Students submit revised essays incorporating feedback and self-reflection
• Both initial and revised versions contribute to assessment (initial performance + revision quality)

ICA1 & ICA2: Key Characteristics

• Duration: 75 minutes each (with accommodations for eligible students)
• Format: Closed-universe (all necessary legal materials provided; no outside sources)
• Revision: None—measures independent performance under time pressure
• Proctoring: Administered in classroom or exam space with faculty proctor present
• Academic integrity: Standard exam integrity protocols apply

Format Differences

ICA1 uses a hybrid Part A/Part B format: targeted preliminary questions followed by a focused essay, allowing students to identify key issues before substantive analysis.

ICA2 uses a two-task performance format: a medium-answer preliminary analysis followed by extended essay, testing ability to manage multiple issues within time constraints.

Skill Progression

ICAs measure students' ability to:

• Read and synthesize novel fact patterns quickly
• Identify controlling legal issues under time pressure
• Apply course rules to unfamiliar factual scenarios
• Organize complex analysis coherently in limited time
• Prioritize analysis based on significance and time available

Common Rubric Dimensions

While specific rubrics vary by assessment, all measure performance on these core dimensions:

• Rule Identification & Synthesis: Can students identify controlling legal rules and synthesize them accurately from provided materials?
• Rule Explanation: Can students explain rules using case precedent and distinguish between holdings and reasoning?
• Application: Can students apply rules to specific facts with concrete detail, addressing multiple perspectives?
• Organization & Clarity: Is the analysis well-organized and clearly written for the intended audience?
• Conclusion: Does the student reach a clear, reasoned conclusion based on the analysis?

Rubric Standards by Assessment Type

Portfolio Assessments (PS1, PS2, PS3): Detailed rubrics measure both process and product quality. Short-answer questions grade primarily on accuracy and precision. Essays grade on depth, multi-sided reasoning, and quality of explanation.

Timed Assessments (ICA1, ICA2): Rubrics adjust expectations for time-constrained contexts. Emphasis shifts to issue identification, rule clarity, and strategic prioritization rather than polish and depth. Answers need not be as comprehensive as portfolio work.